Home › Lessons › Verbs in time

The simple past of irregular verbs

A2Verbs in time · lesson 8 of 28

In the simple past (the one-word past, like "went" or "saw"), most irregular verbs don't add _-te_ or _-de_. They change their vowel instead: _lopen_ (to walk) becomes _ik liep_ (I walked). In the singular (one person or thing) nothing is added to that new form, and in the plural it ends in _-en_: _wij liepen_ (we walked).

The pattern

Most irregular verbs show the past with a new vowel instead of _-te_ or _-de_. In the singular nothing is added; the plural ends in _-en_.

Examples

Ik liep gisteren naar het station.Yesterday I walked to the station.
Sanne schreef een kaart voor haar buurvrouw.Sanne wrote a card for her neighbour.
Daan dronk koffie in de trein.Daan drank coffee on the train.
Carlos kwam te laat op zijn werk.Carlos got to work late.
Fatima zag haar huisarts in de supermarkt.Fatima saw her GP in the supermarket.
Priya en Bas namen de trein naar Utrecht.Priya and Bas took the train to Utrecht.
Het was koud op het perron.It was cold on the platform.
Jullie waren zaterdag niet thuis.You two weren't at home on Saturday.
Emma had hoofdpijn.Emma had a headache.
Mijn buren gingen op vakantie naar Spanje.My neighbours went on holiday to Spain.

Why it works this way

Compare a [regular verb](#/lesson/simple-past-regular) with an irregular one:

Now compare present and past: _wij lopen_, _wij liepen_. The plural ends in _-en_ in both; only the vowel tells you it already happened. In the singular, the past even drops the _-t_ of the present: _hij loopt_ (he walks), _hij liep_ (he walked).

Good news: English does this too. Drink, drank is _drinken_, _dronk_; come, came is _komen_, _kwam_. The pairs don't always match, though: walked is regular in English, while _liep_ is not. You usually can't tell from the infinitive (the dictionary form, like _lopen_) whether a verb is irregular, so learn each one as a pair. [Patterns in irregular verbs](#/lesson/strong-verb-patterns) shows groups that change in the same way.

When do you use it? In conversation, Dutch speakers often use the perfect for a single event (_ik heb koffie gedronken_). The simple past is typical in stories and for describing how things were, and _was_ and _had_ are very common in everyday speech too.

Remember: the new form tells you it is the past, and the ending tells you how many. Nothing for one, _-en_ for more than one.

Watch out

Quick check

Use the simple past.

  1. _Mei ... gisteren thee bij haar buurvrouw._ (_drinken_)
  2. _Ahmed en Yara ... vorige week naar Utrecht._ (_gaan_)
  3. Choose: _Sanne en Joris (was / waren) zaterdag op een verjaardag._
  4. Fix the verb: _Bas nemde de fiets naar zijn werk._

Answers

  1. _dronk_: Mei is one person, so nothing is added.
  2. _gingen_: two people, so the plural form.
  3. _waren_: _Sanne en Joris_ is plural, so not _was_.
  4. _Bas nam de fiets naar zijn werk._ (_nemen_ is irregular: _nam_, not _nemde_)

Use it today

Send a friend or colleague three sentences about your weekend, using _was_, _ging_ and one more verb from this lesson. For example: _Zaterdag was het mooi weer. Ik ging naar het strand en zag veel fietsers._

← The simple past of regular verbs: -te and -de Patterns in irregular verbs →
Practice this, don't just read it

Play the grammar games (de/het, die/dat, geen/niet, word order and more), track your streak, and get feedback on every answer. Part of the full Dutch Fluency dashboard. Start free. Pro is 7 days free, then €19 a month, cancel any time.

Start free Play the games